From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Louder v. Coleman

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 10, 2009
Civil Action No. 09-1124 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 10, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09-1124.

December 10, 2009


ORDER


AND NOW, this 10th day of December, 2009, after the Petitioner, Donald Louder, filed an action in the above-captioned case, andafter a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties until November 2, 2009, to file written objections thereto, and no objections having been filed, and upon independent review of the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Section 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed before being served because it is second or successive and Petitioner has not shown that he has obtained permission from the Court of Appeals to file it.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if the Petitioner desires to appeal from this Order he must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed.R.App.P.


Summaries of

Louder v. Coleman

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 10, 2009
Civil Action No. 09-1124 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 10, 2009)
Case details for

Louder v. Coleman

Case Details

Full title:DONALD LOUDER, Petitioner v. Sgt. COLEMAN, and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY F THE…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 10, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 09-1124 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 10, 2009)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Bradt

The rule articulated in Melendez-Diaz and Bullcoming does not apply retroactively to cases on collateral…

Washington v. Harry

"However, even if a habeas petitioner's second or successive petition falls within either of these…