From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lou v. MA Labs., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 7, 2013
No. C 12-05409 WHA (N.D. Cal. May. 7, 2013)

Opinion

No. C 12-05409 WHA

05-07-2013

MICHELLE LOU, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, plaintiffs, v. MA LABORATORIES, INC., ABRAHAM MA, CHRISTINE RAO, and CHRISTY YEE, Defendants.


ORDER RE: MOTION

TO AMEND

SCHEDULING ORDER

The motion to alter the scheduling order will be heard on THURSDAY, MAY 9, AT 8:00 A.M. In addition, the Court is concerned that defendants have been stonewalling discovery. Magistrate Judge Cousins so concluded (Dkt. No. 50 at 1 ("Defendants, however, continue to 'stonewall'"); see also Dkt. No. 67 at 2 ("[T]he Court . . . is not impressed by defendants' lack of discovery diligence since Judge Alsup's February 6 discovery order.")). At the hearing, counsel should be prepared to address whether the jury should be advised of and instructed regarding defendants' actions in discovery, including adverse inferences.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Lou v. MA Labs., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 7, 2013
No. C 12-05409 WHA (N.D. Cal. May. 7, 2013)
Case details for

Lou v. MA Labs., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MICHELLE LOU, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 7, 2013

Citations

No. C 12-05409 WHA (N.D. Cal. May. 7, 2013)