From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lotte-Lublin v. Cosby

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 31, 2023
2:23-cv-00932-GMN-DJA (D. Nev. Oct. 31, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-00932-GMN-DJA

10-31-2023

LISE LOTTE-LUBLIN, LILI BERNARD, JANICE BAKER-KINNEY, REBECCA COOPER, LINDA KIRKPATRICK, JANICE DICKINSON, ANGELA LESLIE, PAM JOY ABEYTA, AND HEIDI THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM COSBY JR., Defendant.

MERSON LAW, PLLC By JORDAN RUTSKY Counsel for Plaintiff JENNIFER BONJEAN- Pro Hac Vice ASHLEY COHEN- Pro Hac Vice Bonjean Law Group, PLLC. Attorneys for Defendant


MERSON LAW, PLLC By JORDAN RUTSKY Counsel for Plaintiff

JENNIFER BONJEAN- Pro Hac Vice ASHLEY COHEN- Pro Hac Vice Bonjean Law Group, PLLC. Attorneys for Defendant

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT'S TIME TO ANSWER THE COMPLAINT

(FIRST REQUEST)

DANIEL J. ALBREGTS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between counsel for the Plaintiffs, Jordan Merson, Jordan Rutsky, Nathan Werksman, Alice Bohn, Manraj Sekhon, Brian Panish, Rahul Pavipudi, and Robert Glassman, for Lisa Lotte-Lublin, Lili Bernard, Janice Baker-Kinney, Rebecca Cooper, Linda Kirkpatrick, Janice Dickinson, Angela Leslie, Pam Joy Abeyta, and Heidi Thomas, (hereinafter “Plaintiff'), and Jennifer Bonjean and Ashley Cohen counsel for William Cosby Jr. (“the Defendant”) (collectively, “the Parties”), that the time for Defendant to respond to the Complaint be on or before November 30, 2023.

Denial of this request would deny defense counsel sufficient time to effectively and thoroughly prepare and submit pretrial motions and notices of defense, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

The Stipulation is entered where counsel for the Defendant needs additional time to consult with her client. Defendant's advanced age (85 years old) and a myriad of health challenges, has resulted in limited opportunities for counsel to communicate with him. Furthermore, Defendant is currently residing a significant distance from counsel's New York office which adds an extra challenge to communication. Counsel needs additional time in which to consult and communicate with Defendant about how to Answer Plaintiff's complaint, which simply cannot be done by way of zoom.

Counsel for Plaintiff does not stipulate to the Defendant's reasoning set forth above but agrees to the extension of time proposed by the Defendant.

This is the First Stipulation for an extension to file an answer herein.

ORDER

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Defendant, William Cosby, Jr., herein shall have to and including November 30, 2023, to file an Answer to the Complaint in this matter.


Summaries of

Lotte-Lublin v. Cosby

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 31, 2023
2:23-cv-00932-GMN-DJA (D. Nev. Oct. 31, 2023)
Case details for

Lotte-Lublin v. Cosby

Case Details

Full title:LISE LOTTE-LUBLIN, LILI BERNARD, JANICE BAKER-KINNEY, REBECCA COOPER…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Oct 31, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-00932-GMN-DJA (D. Nev. Oct. 31, 2023)