From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lott v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 21, 1977
55 A.D.2d 1032 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Opinion

January 21, 1977

Appeal from the Court of Claims.

Present — Marsh, P.J., Moule, Simons, Goldman and Witmer, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Claimant appeals from a judgment of the Court of Claims which granted him an award for damages resulting from the appropriation of a portion of his property by the State of New York. The award and its separate components of direct damages and consequential damages are within the range of expert testimony and are affirmed (Matter of City of New York [A W Realty Corp.], 1 N.Y.2d 428; City of Buffalo v Clement Co., 45 A.D.2d 620). Although the experts characterized the highest and best use of the property differently, the record discloses that their findings were essentially the same. Of particular significance is that each of the experts supported his appraisal with the same comparable sale on a whole-to-whole comparison.


Summaries of

Lott v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 21, 1977
55 A.D.2d 1032 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)
Case details for

Lott v. State

Case Details

Full title:PARKER M. LOTT, Appellant, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent. (Claim No…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 21, 1977

Citations

55 A.D.2d 1032 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Citing Cases

Matter of Village of Hilton v. Edelman

Defendants' appraiser determined that the highest and best use was a commercial use permitted by the zoning…

Alm v. State

The remainder of the award and its separate components of direct damages and consequential damages are within…