From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Losorwith v. Wilson Invs. LP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 26, 2011
Case No.: 1:11-CV-00892-LJO-SKO (E.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2011)

Opinion

Case No.: 1:11-CV-00892-LJO-SKO

10-26-2011

KELLI LOSORWITH, Plaintiff, v. WILSON INVESTMENTS, LP; ROGER ROCKA dba ROGER ROCKA'S MUSIC HALL DINNER THEATER, Defendants.

ROGER S. BONAKDAR #253920 NUTTALL COLEMAN & WILSON ATTORNEYS FOR Defendants, ROGER ROCKA dba ROGER ROCKA'S MUSIC HALL DINNER THEATER MOORE LAW FIRM, PC TANYA LEVINSON MOORE Attorneys for Plaintiff


(SPACE BELOW FOR FILING STAMP ONLY)

ROGER S. BONAKDAR #253920

NUTTALL COLEMAN & WILSON

ATTORNEYS FOR Defendants,

ROGER ROCKA dba ROGER

ROCKA'S MUSIC HALL DINNER THEATER

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE DUE TO

SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEYS

WHEREAS the Mandatory Scheduling Conference is currently set for November 1, 2011.

WHEREAS Defendant ROGER ROCKA dba ROGER ROCKA'S MUSIC HALL DINNER THEATER (hereinafter "Rocka") is/was proceeding in pro per.

WHEREAS Defendant Wilson Investments, LP (hereinafter "Wilson"), is/was represented by Timothy O'Hara, Esq.

WHEREAS Defendants Wilson and Rocka have retained new counsel (the undersigned Roger Bonakdar of the law firm of Nuttall Coleman & Wilson), and counsel has only recently substituted into the case.

WHEREAS new counsel, Mr. Roger Bonakdar Esq., has a scheduling conflict and is not available to appear at the Scheduling Conference, as calendared.

WHEREAS in light of the above recent substitution and unavailability, the parties agree that the Status Conference should be continued to allow new counsel to become familiar with the file, the subject premises, and otherwise complete some initial investigation into the claims to determine whether an early resolution of the action is practicable and/or appropriate.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between attorneys for the respective parties herein that the Status Conference be continued to December 6, 2011, or another date thereafter which is acceptable to the court.

Respectfully submitted,

NUTTALL & COLEMAN

ROGER S. BONAKDAR

Attorneys for Defendants

MOORE LAW FIRM, PC

TANYA LEVINSON MOORE

Attorneys for Plaintiff

ORDER

Based on the stipulation of the parties, good cause exists to continue the Scheduling Conference in the above referenced matter.

As such, the Scheduling Conference shall be continued to December 13, 2011, at 10:00 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Losorwith v. Wilson Invs. LP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 26, 2011
Case No.: 1:11-CV-00892-LJO-SKO (E.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2011)
Case details for

Losorwith v. Wilson Invs. LP

Case Details

Full title:KELLI LOSORWITH, Plaintiff, v. WILSON INVESTMENTS, LP; ROGER ROCKA dba…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 26, 2011

Citations

Case No.: 1:11-CV-00892-LJO-SKO (E.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2011)