From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Loscalzo v. Lupinacci

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 25, 1996
233 A.D.2d 483 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

November 25, 1996.

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (D'Emilio, J.), dated September 25, 1995, as granted the defendants' motion to vacate their default in answering the complaint.

Before: Bracken, J.P., Copertino, Joy, Florio and McGinity, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants proffered a reasonable excuse for their default in interposing an answer and a meritorious defense ( see, Fennell v Mason, 204 AD2d 599; Putney v Pearlman, 203 AD2d 333).


Summaries of

Loscalzo v. Lupinacci

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 25, 1996
233 A.D.2d 483 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Loscalzo v. Lupinacci

Case Details

Full title:LAURENCE LOSCALZO, Appellant, v. PALMERINO A. LUPINACCI et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 25, 1996

Citations

233 A.D.2d 483 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
650 N.Y.S.2d 967