From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Losada v. Liberty Lines Transit, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 21, 1989
155 A.D.2d 337 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

November 21, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Jack Turret, J.).


Defendant was operating a bus owned by the County of Westchester and therefore a notice of claim was required. (Montalto v Westchester St. Transp. Co., 102 A.D.2d 816, 818 [2d Dept 1984], citing Coleman v Westchester St. Transp. Co., 57 N.Y.2d 734.) The letters from plaintiff's counsel to Liberty Lines dated December 1, 1986 and December 15, 1986, as well as the no-fault application signed by claimant, coupled with the fact that the claim was handled by Liberty Lines' general counsel, Vincent P. Nesci, who is regularly engaged in representing the county in actions arising out of accidents occurring on buses operated by Liberty Lines, constituted in the aggregate a sufficient notice of claim within the meaning of General Municipal Law § 50-e. (See, Tacinelli v Liberty Lines, 123 A.D.2d 756 [2d Dept 1986].)

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Kassal, Wallach and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

Losada v. Liberty Lines Transit, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 21, 1989
155 A.D.2d 337 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Losada v. Liberty Lines Transit, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CORALIA LOSADA, Respondent, v. LIBERTY LINES TRANSIT, INC., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 21, 1989

Citations

155 A.D.2d 337 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
547 N.Y.S.2d 307

Citing Cases

Lerner v. N.Y.C. Transit Auth.

(Affirmation in Support, Exh. B) Such notice has been deemed to constitute a sufficient Notice of Claim…