From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aranessa L. v. Isaac C.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 28, 2017
148 A.D.3d 609 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

3538.

03-28-2017

In re ARANESSA L., Petitioner–Respondent, v. ISAAC C., Respondent–Appellant.

Richard L. Herzfeld, P.C., New York (Richard L. Herzfeld of counsel), for appellant. Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Elizabeth I. Freedman of counsel), for respondent. Geoffrey P. Berman, Larchmont, attorney for the child.


Richard L. Herzfeld, P.C., New York (Richard L. Herzfeld of counsel), for appellant.

Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Elizabeth I. Freedman of counsel), for respondent.

Geoffrey P. Berman, Larchmont, attorney for the child.

RICHTER, J.P., MAZZARELLI, KAHN, GESMER, JJ.

Order, Family Court, New York County (Susan K. Knipps, J.), entered on or about March 10, 2016, which, after a hearing, declared respondent to be the father of the subject child, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The Family Court properly concluded that the best interests of the child required that respondent be equitably estopped from obtaining DNA testing and denying paternity. The record established that he assumed the role of a parent, albeit in a somewhat limited way, and led the child to believe that he was her father for the next 15 years of her life (see Matter of Glenda G. v. Mariano M., 62 A.D.3d 536, 880 N.Y.S.2d 18 [1st Dept.2009], lv. denied 13 N.Y.3d 708, 2009 WL 3350436 [2009] ).


Summaries of

Aranessa L. v. Isaac C.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Mar 28, 2017
148 A.D.3d 609 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Aranessa L. v. Isaac C.

Case Details

Full title:In re Aranessa L., Petitioner-Respondent, v. Isaac C.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 28, 2017

Citations

148 A.D.3d 609 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 2380
50 N.Y.S.3d 354