From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lorino v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Feb 23, 2021
249 A.3d 500 (Pa. 2021)

Opinion

No. 427 EAL 2020

02-23-2021

Vincent LORINO, Petitioner v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (Commonwealth of Pennsylvania), Respondents


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of February, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Whether Commonwealth Court's decision on this question of first impression should be reversed for violating the separation of powers doctrine, since it improperly exercised legislative power by replacing the word "may" with the word "shall" in Section 440 of the Workers' Compensation Act; its [o]pinion even states, "... despite the General Assembly's use of the word `may,' this [c]ourt has always ..." required an unreasonable contest before assessing attorney's fees against an insurer? The Application of Amicus Curiae Pennsylvania Association of Justice for Leave to File Statement Supporting the Allowance of Appeal of Petitioner/Claimant, Vincent Lorino is GRANTED.


Summaries of

Lorino v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Feb 23, 2021
249 A.3d 500 (Pa. 2021)
Case details for

Lorino v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.

Case Details

Full title:VINCENT LORINO, Petitioner v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

Date published: Feb 23, 2021

Citations

249 A.3d 500 (Pa. 2021)