Opinion
1203 CA 17–01766
11-09-2018
Patrick LORETO, in the Right of and ON BEHALF OF ENCORE PROPERTIES OF ROCHESTER, LLC, and Riccardo Dursi, in the Right of and on Behalf of Encore Properties of Rochester, LLC, Plaintiffs–Appellants–Respondents, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR the REGISTERED HOLDERS OF CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP., Commercial Mortgage Pass–Through Certificates, Series 2007–C5, Timothy Foster, as Receiver, Defendants–Respondents, Kenneth P. Ray, Jr., Executor of the Estate of Kenneth P. Ray, Deceased, Defendant–Respondent-Appellant, et al., Defendants. (Appeal No. 4.)
JOSEPH A. TADDEO, JR., ROCHESTER, FOR PLAINTIFF–APPELLANT–RESPONDENT PATRICK LORETO, IN THE RIGHT OF AND ON BEHALF OF ENCORE PROPERTIES OF ROCHESTER, LLC. FELT EVANS, LLP, CLINTON (JAY G. WILLIAMS, III, OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–RESPONDENT–APPELLANT. BOND, SCHOENECK & KING, PLLC, ROCHESTER (GREGORY J. MCDONALD OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–RESPONDENT TIMOTHY FOSTER, AS RECEIVER. RIKER DANZIG SCHERER HYLAND & PERRETTI LLP, MORRISTOWN, NEW JERSEY (MICHAEL R. O'DONNELL OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–RESPONDENT WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR THE REGISTERED HOLDERS OF CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP., COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE PASS–THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007–C5.
JOSEPH A. TADDEO, JR., ROCHESTER, FOR PLAINTIFF–APPELLANT–RESPONDENT PATRICK LORETO, IN THE RIGHT OF AND ON BEHALF OF ENCORE PROPERTIES OF ROCHESTER, LLC.
FELT EVANS, LLP, CLINTON (JAY G. WILLIAMS, III, OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–RESPONDENT–APPELLANT.
BOND, SCHOENECK & KING, PLLC, ROCHESTER (GREGORY J. MCDONALD OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–RESPONDENT TIMOTHY FOSTER, AS RECEIVER.
RIKER DANZIG SCHERER HYLAND & PERRETTI LLP, MORRISTOWN, NEW JERSEY (MICHAEL R. O'DONNELL OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–RESPONDENT WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR THE REGISTERED HOLDERS OF CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP., COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE PASS–THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007–C5.
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, NEMOYER, AND CURRAN, JJ.
ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.