From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lorenz v. TX Workforce Com.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Jul 18, 2007
No. 04-07-00295-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 18, 2007)

Opinion

No. 04-07-00295-CV

Delivered and Filed: July 18, 2007.

Appeal from the 216th Judicial District Court, Bandera County, Texas, Trial Court No. 9197-04, Honorable Stephen B. Ables, Judge Presiding.

Sitting: ALMA L. LÓPEZ, Chief Justice, CATHERINE STONE, Justice, STEVEN C. HILBIG, Justice.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Daniel A. Lorenz appeals the trial court's order denying his motion for a default judgment. With exceptions not applicable here, "an appeal may be prosecuted only from a final judgment." North East Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Aldridge, 400 S.W.2d 893, 895 (Tex. 1966). "[T]o be final a judgment must dispose of all issues and parties in a case." Id. The trial court's order denying Lorenz's motion for a default judgment does not dispose of all issues and parties in the case and is not an order subject to interlocutory appeal. See Tex. Civ. Prac. Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014 (Vernon Supp. 2006).

After the clerk's record was filed, we ordered Lorenz to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Lorenz did not file a response within the time provided. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM


Summaries of

Lorenz v. TX Workforce Com.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Jul 18, 2007
No. 04-07-00295-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 18, 2007)
Case details for

Lorenz v. TX Workforce Com.

Case Details

Full title:Daniel A. LORENZ, Appellant v. TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION and Wal-Mart…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio

Date published: Jul 18, 2007

Citations

No. 04-07-00295-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 18, 2007)