From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lorenz v. E. W. Bancorp Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 17, 2016
CASE NO.: 2:15-CV-06336-CAS-FFM (C.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2016)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 2:15-CV-06336-CAS-FFM

10-17-2016

RAE H. LORENZ; WILLIAM E. WARD; PAULA AND STEVEN TAMKIN; SUE HAYNES; RICHARD T. COLE; WILLIAM H. WOOLBRIGHT; IRVING B. RUPPEL; KENNETH NELSON; MICHAEL CHARPENTIER; LORALEE FREILICH; and LORETTA J. ALMAN Plaintiffs, v. EAST WEST BANCORP INC. a Delaware Corporation; EAST WEST BANK, a California Corporation; MICHAEL GUREVICH, an individual; WILLIAM KENT, an individual; SAMSON EMELIANOV, an individual; CHARTER INVESTMENTS, INC., a Wyoming Corporation; and DOES 1 - 200. Defendants.

Peter C. Ward, Esq. SBN 126459 Christopher H. Hagen, Esq. SBN 179529 Steven M. Nuñez, Esq. SBN 185421 WARD & HAGEN, LLP 440 Stevens Avenue, Suite 350 Solana Beach, California 92075 Telephone: (858) 847-0505 Facsimile: (858) 847-0105 Attorneys for Plaintiffs


Peter C. Ward, Esq. SBN 126459
Christopher H. Hagen, Esq. SBN 179529
Steven M. Nuñez, Esq. SBN 185421
WARD & HAGEN, LLP
440 Stevens Avenue, Suite 350
Solana Beach, California 92075
Telephone: (858) 847-0505
Facsimile: (858) 847-0105

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

JUDGMENT

The defendants, Charter Investments, Inc., a Wyoming Corporation, Michael Gurevich, an individual and William Kent, an individual having failed to plead or otherwise defend in this action, and default having heretofore been entered; upon application of plaintiffs and upon affidavit that defendants are indebted to plaintiffs in the principal sums stated below, plus interest thereon from the dates listed:

Irving Ruppel

January 13, 2014

Richard T. Cole

January 15, 2014

Rae Lorenz

January 21, 2014

Michael Charpentier

January 21, 2014

Loretta Alman

January 30, 2014

Sue Haynes

January 30, 2014

Loralee Freilich

February 3, 2014

William E. Ward

February 12, 2014

William H. Woolbright

February 11, 2014

Paula Tamkin and Steven Tamkin

February 18, 2014

Kenneth Nelson

February 26, 2014

That defendant had been defaulted for failure to appear pursuant to Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and that the claim is for a sum certain or for a sum which can by computation be made certain; it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that plaintiffs, recover of the defendants, jointly, the sums listed below:

Name

RemainingAmount Due

Costs

PrejudgmentInterest

Rae H. Lorenz

$258,970.59

691.37

$

William E. Ward

$1,055.904.09

691.37

$

Paula and StevenTamkin

$181,843.07

691.37

$

Sue Haynes

$194,508.65

691.37

$

Richard T. Cole

$155,606.92

691.37

$

William H. Woolbright

$125,041.27

691.37

$

Irving B. Ruppel

$118,315.99

691.37

$

Kenneth Nelson

$112,774.37

691.37

$

Michael Charpentier

$111,147.80

691.37

$

Loralee Freilich

$83,360.85

691.37

$

Loretta J. Alman

$58,754.78

691.37

$

This judgment is entered by the Court at the request of the plaintiff and upon affidavit that said amount is due, in accordance with Rule 55(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Dated: October 17, 2016

/s/_________

Honorable Christina A. Snyder,

US District Court Judge


Summaries of

Lorenz v. E. W. Bancorp Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 17, 2016
CASE NO.: 2:15-CV-06336-CAS-FFM (C.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2016)
Case details for

Lorenz v. E. W. Bancorp Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RAE H. LORENZ; WILLIAM E. WARD; PAULA AND STEVEN TAMKIN; SUE HAYNES…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 17, 2016

Citations

CASE NO.: 2:15-CV-06336-CAS-FFM (C.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2016)