From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Loredo v. Drive Financial

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Dec 6, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-5673 (MLC) (D.N.J. Dec. 6, 2007)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-5673 (MLC).

December 6, 2007


MEMORANDUM OPINION


THE COURT having ordered the removing party — the defendant Drive Financial ("DFN") — to show cause why the action should not be remanded to state court (1) for lack of jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § ("Section") 1331 and the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Improvement Act ("MMWIA"), 15 U.S.C. §§ 2301- 2312, and (2) as being removed in a defective manner under Sections 1446 and 1447 (dkt. entry no. 2); and DFN in response (1) "withdraw[ing] its Notice of Removal", and (2) advising the Court that "[c]ounsel for Plaintiff and [DFN] have conferred and consent and agree to the remand of this matter to [state court]" (dkt. entry no. 4, 12-5-07 DFN Counsel Letter); and the Court determining that the order to show cause should be resolved before the return date; and thus the Court intending to (1) grant the order to show cause, and (2) remand the action to state court; and for good cause appearing, the Court will issue an appropriate order and judgment.


Summaries of

Loredo v. Drive Financial

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Dec 6, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-5673 (MLC) (D.N.J. Dec. 6, 2007)
Case details for

Loredo v. Drive Financial

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL LOREDO, Plaintiff, v. DRIVE FINANCIAL, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Dec 6, 2007

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-5673 (MLC) (D.N.J. Dec. 6, 2007)