From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lordmaster v. Moore

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION
May 12, 2016
Civil Action No. 7:16-cv-00160 (W.D. Va. May. 12, 2016)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 7:16-cv-00160

05-12-2016

FRANKIE JAE LORDMASTER, Plaintiff, v. MOORE, III, Defendant(s).


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Frankie Jae LordMaster, proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By Order entered April 20, 2016, the court directed plaintiff to submit within 10 days from the date of the Order a signed consent to withholding of fees form in order to complete the application to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff was advised that a failure to comply would result in dismissal of this action without prejudice.

More than 10 days have elapsed, and plaintiff has failed to comply with the described conditions. Accordingly, the court dismisses the action without prejudice and strikes the case from the active docket of the court. Plaintiff may refile the claims in a separate action once plaintiff is prepared to comply with the noted conditions.

The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and accompanying Order to plaintiff.

ENTER: This 12th day of May, 2016.

/s/_________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Lordmaster v. Moore

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION
May 12, 2016
Civil Action No. 7:16-cv-00160 (W.D. Va. May. 12, 2016)
Case details for

Lordmaster v. Moore

Case Details

Full title:FRANKIE JAE LORDMASTER, Plaintiff, v. MOORE, III, Defendant(s).

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION

Date published: May 12, 2016

Citations

Civil Action No. 7:16-cv-00160 (W.D. Va. May. 12, 2016)