From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lord v. Hall

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 2, 2012
Civil Action No. 10-cv-02695-PAB-KLM (D. Colo. Oct. 2, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 10-cv-02695-PAB-KLM

10-02-2012

FRANK LORD, Plaintiff, v. JASON HALL, Colorado Springs Police Officer, RICHARD HAYES, Colorado Springs Police Officer, and UNKNOWN COLORADO SPRINGS POLICE OFFICERS, Defendants.


Judge Philip A. Brimmer ?


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Stipulated Motion for Costs [Docket No. 66] filed by defendants Jason Hall and Richard Hayes. Defendants request their costs pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1). Plaintiff has filed no response to the motion and defendants indicate that plaintiff does not oppose such relief. Rule 54 provides that, "[u]nless a federal statute, these rules, or a court order provides otherwise, costs -other than attorney's fees - should be allowed to the prevailing party." Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1). The Court finds no reason to depart from the "presumption that the district court will award costs to the prevailing party." Cantrell v. Int'l Bhd. of Elec. Workers, 69 F.3d 456, 459 (10th Cir. 1995) (en banc). Therefore, it is

ORDERED that the Stipulated Motion for Costs [Docket No. 66] is GRANTED. Costs shall be taxed in favor of defendants and against plaintiff in the amount of $1,950.79.

BY THE COURT:

____________________

PHILIP A. BRIMMER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Lord v. Hall

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 2, 2012
Civil Action No. 10-cv-02695-PAB-KLM (D. Colo. Oct. 2, 2012)
Case details for

Lord v. Hall

Case Details

Full title:FRANK LORD, Plaintiff, v. JASON HALL, Colorado Springs Police Officer…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Oct 2, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 10-cv-02695-PAB-KLM (D. Colo. Oct. 2, 2012)