From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lord v. Coffee

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 30, 2020
2:20-cv-00495-GMN-BNW (D. Nev. Apr. 30, 2020)

Opinion

2:20-cv-00495-GMN-BNW

04-30-2020

SEBASTIAN LORD, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT COFFEE, et al., Defendants.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

BRENDAWEKSLER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On March 13, 2020, the court entered an order requiring Plaintiff to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis or to pay the filing fee in this case. (Order (ECF No. 3).) Plaintiff's deadline for doing so was April 13, 2020. (Id.) The court further advised Plaintiff that a failure to comply with the court's order would result in a recommendation that his case be dismissed. (Id.) Given that plaintiff has not complied with the court's orders or taken any action in this case since the court's order, he appears to have abandoned this case.

IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED that plaintiff's case be dismissed without prejudice.

NOTICE

This report and recommendation is submitted to the United States district judge assigned to this case under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A party who objects to this report and recommendation may file a written objection supported by points and authorities within fourteen days of being served with this report and recommendation. Local Rule IB 3-2(a). Failure to file a timely objection may waive the right to appeal the district court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Lord v. Coffee

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 30, 2020
2:20-cv-00495-GMN-BNW (D. Nev. Apr. 30, 2020)
Case details for

Lord v. Coffee

Case Details

Full title:SEBASTIAN LORD, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT COFFEE, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Apr 30, 2020

Citations

2:20-cv-00495-GMN-BNW (D. Nev. Apr. 30, 2020)