From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lorch v. Lorch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 10, 1958
7 A.D.2d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)

Opinion

November 10, 1958


Appeal from an order denying appellant's motion (1) to transfer from the Municipal Court of the City of New York a summary proceeding, brought by respondent to recover possession of real property from appellant, and (2) to consolidate said proceeding with this action, brought by respondent for a separation from appellant. Order reversed, without costs, and motion granted. Since appellant cannot obtain affirmative equitable relief in the summary proceeding ( Levy v. Van Dorn Hotel Corp., 60 N.Y.S.2d 795), and since there are questions of law and fact common to the proceeding and the action which may be disposed of in one lawsuit without prejudice to a substantial right of either party (cf. Corcoran v. Scolaro, 267 App. Div. 871), a consolidation should be had to avoid multiplicity of suits ( Datz v. Economy Cotton Goods Stores, 263 N.Y. 252, 254; Scherman v. Scherman, 261 App. Div. 908). Settle order on notice. Wenzel, Acting P.J., Beldock, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lorch v. Lorch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 10, 1958
7 A.D.2d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)
Case details for

Lorch v. Lorch

Case Details

Full title:MADELINE LORCH, Respondent, v. LADISLAUS LORCH, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 10, 1958

Citations

7 A.D.2d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)

Citing Cases

Matter of City of Rochester v. Levin

asserts that they have a common use, that their condemnation was begun by one petition, that some common…

Kally v. Mount Sinai Hosp

Resolution of the action in the Supreme Court will necessarily decide the issues in the holdover proceeding,…