From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lorber v. Prospect Park Nursing Home, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 10, 2001
289 A.D.2d 303 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

2000-09015

Submitted November 16, 2001.

December 10, 2001.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Patterson, J.), dated July 17, 2000, which granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

LAWRENCE LEVINE, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

AMABILE ERMAN, P.C., Staten Island, N.Y. (IRENE P. ZIEGLER of counsel), for respondent.

Before: CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., ANITA R. FLORIO, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Jacob Lorber was found in his bed in the defendant's nursing home facility, with edema and redness of his left foot and ankle which was painful to the touch. Subsequent X-rays revealed that Lorber had a fractured left fibula and tibia. Lorber was unable, due to his medical infirmities, to explain what may have caused the fracture, and there were no witnesses to any event which may have caused the injuries. Additionally, Lorber's medical chart did not contain any entries or notations relating to any occurrence which may have caused the injuries. The plaintiff commenced this action against the defendant alleging that Lorber must have received these injuries as the result of a fall from his bed.

On its motion for summary judgment, the defendant submitted proof in admissible form demonstrating its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see, Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320). In opposition to the motion, the plaintiff's assertions concerning the defendant's negligence were purely speculative, and unsupported by any competent evidence. Thus, they were insufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment (see, CPLR 3212[b]; Schiavone v. Victory Mem. Hosp., 279 A.D.2d 464; Damen v. North Shore Univ. Hosp., 262 A.D.2d 598; cf., Weber v. Levine, 281 A.D.2d 474).

The plaintiff's remaining contention is without merit.

O'BRIEN, J.P., FLORIO, SCHMIDT and SMITH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lorber v. Prospect Park Nursing Home, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 10, 2001
289 A.D.2d 303 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Lorber v. Prospect Park Nursing Home, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:AGNES LORBER, ETC., Appellant, v. PROSPECT PARK NURSING HOME, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 10, 2001

Citations

289 A.D.2d 303 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
734 N.Y.S.2d 865

Citing Cases

Yousafzai v. City of New York

Contrary to plaintiff's contention, the affirmation by plaintiff's counsel was insufficient to demonstrate…