From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lor v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 5, 2012
CIV S- 12-0434 GGH (E.D. Cal. Mar. 5, 2012)

Opinion

CIV S- 12-0434 GGH

03-05-2012

DIA LOR, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

Plaintiff has not paid the fee ordinarily required to file an action in this court, and has filed an incomplete application to proceed without prepayment of fees. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(a). The current application states that plaintiff has received money from an "other source" but she has not described the source of money, the amount received, or what she expects to continue to receive. Plaintiff will be provided the opportunity to submit either the appropriate affidavit in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff shall submit, within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this order, either a completed application and affidavit in support of her request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court, or the appropriate filing fee; plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed; and

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis.

Gregory G. Hollows

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
GGH:076/Lor0434.ifp.wpd


Summaries of

Lor v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 5, 2012
CIV S- 12-0434 GGH (E.D. Cal. Mar. 5, 2012)
Case details for

Lor v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:DIA LOR, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 5, 2012

Citations

CIV S- 12-0434 GGH (E.D. Cal. Mar. 5, 2012)