From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Loporto v. N.Y.C. Transit Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 2, 2000
276 A.D.2d 472 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted September 6, 2000

October 2, 2000.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Mastro, J.), dated September 17, 1999, which granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff Deborah Loporto did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d).

Lurie Flatow, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Jay Flatow of counsel), for appellants.

Wallace D. Gossett, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Anita Isola of counsel), for respondents.

Before: GUY JAMES MANGANO, P.J., SONDRA MILLER, LEO F. McGINITY, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants established a prima facie case that the injuries sustained by the plaintiff Deborah Loporto were not serious through the affirmation of orthopedic surgeon Mark F. Sherman, who examined her and concluded that she had "no disability or impairments" (see, Gaddy v. Eyler, 79 N.Y.2d 955).

The medical evidence submitted by the plaintiffs in opposition to the motion failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see, CPLR 3212 [b]).


Summaries of

Loporto v. N.Y.C. Transit Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 2, 2000
276 A.D.2d 472 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Loporto v. N.Y.C. Transit Auth

Case Details

Full title:DEBORAH LOPORTO, ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 2, 2000

Citations

276 A.D.2d 472 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
713 N.Y.S.2d 695