From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lopez v. Williams

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 17, 2023
2:19-cv-01308-APG-NJK (D. Nev. Feb. 17, 2023)

Opinion

2:19-cv-01308-APG-NJK

02-17-2023

Mario Alejandro Lopez, Petitioner v. Brian E. Williams, et al., Respondents


ORDER FOR REDACTION

ANDREW P. GORDON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The respondents filed exhibits that do not comply with the redaction requirements of LR IC 6-1(a)(2) and (3). See ECF Nos. 25-1 at 243; 26-3 at 84, 151; 27-1 at 55, 75, 104, 164. Compelling reasons exist to seal the documents as they contain personal-data identifiers. See LR IC 6-1(a)(2) (“If the involvement of a minor child must be mentioned, only the initials of that child should be used.”); LR IC 6-1(a)(3) (“If an individual's date of birth must be included, only the year should be used.”).

I THEREFORE ORDER the clerk of the court to seal the documents filed as ECF Nos. 25-1, 26-3, and 27-1.

I FURTHER ORDER the respondents to file redacted, publicly available copies of the documents filed as ECF Nos. 25-1, 26-3, and 27-1, in compliance with LR IC 6-1(a)(2)-(3), by February 28, 2023. 1


Summaries of

Lopez v. Williams

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 17, 2023
2:19-cv-01308-APG-NJK (D. Nev. Feb. 17, 2023)
Case details for

Lopez v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:Mario Alejandro Lopez, Petitioner v. Brian E. Williams, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Feb 17, 2023

Citations

2:19-cv-01308-APG-NJK (D. Nev. Feb. 17, 2023)