From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lopez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 22, 2011
Civ. No. S-11-1454 KJM EFB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2011)

Opinion

Civ. No. S-11-1454 KJM EFB

09-22-2011

TERESA D. LOPEZ, an individual; JOSE A. LOPEZ, an individual, Plaintiffs, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. et al., Defendants.


ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Defendant Wells Fargo has filed a motion to dismiss currently set to be heard on September 28, 2011; plaintiffs have not filed an opposition or statement of non-opposition as required by Local Rule 230(c).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

1. The hearing on the motion to dismiss, currently set for September 28, 2011, is vacated; and

2. Plaintiffs are directed to show cause, within seven days of the date of this order, why this action should not be dismissed for their failure to prosecute.

___________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Lopez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 22, 2011
Civ. No. S-11-1454 KJM EFB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2011)
Case details for

Lopez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Case Details

Full title:TERESA D. LOPEZ, an individual; JOSE A. LOPEZ, an individual, Plaintiffs…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 22, 2011

Citations

Civ. No. S-11-1454 KJM EFB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2011)