Opinion
2:21-cv-01161-ART-NJK
04-19-2023
CLARK HILL, PLLC PHILLIP N SMITH, JR., ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 10233 TIFFANY SOLARI, ESQ Nevada Bar No. 16003 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Morgan Family WEINBERG, WHEELER, HUDGINS, GUNN & DIAL, LLC PAOLA M. ARMENI, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 8357 MARISSA T. FEHRMAN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 15544 Attorneys for Defendants Brigido Bayawa, Leilani Flores and Ma Lita Sastrillo
CLARK HILL, PLLC PHILLIP N SMITH, JR., ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 10233 TIFFANY SOLARI, ESQ Nevada Bar No. 16003 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Morgan Family
WEINBERG, WHEELER, HUDGINS, GUNN & DIAL, LLC PAOLA M. ARMENI, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 8357 MARISSA T. FEHRMAN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 15544 Attorneys for Defendants Brigido Bayawa, Leilani Flores and Ma Lita Sastrillo
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE THEIR RESPONSE TO NURSE DEFENDANTS LEILANI FLORES, MALITA SASTRILLO, AND BRIGIDO BAYAWA'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE OPINIONS AND TESTIMONY OF STAN SMITH, PH.D.
Anne R. Traum, United States District Court Judge
Plaintiffs BONNIE LOPEZ, individually as sister and for the estate of MELODY MORGAN, deceased; and COLLEEN LACKEY, individually as mother of MELODY MORGAN, deceased, (collectively, “Morgan Family”), by and through their counsel, Paola M. Armeni, Esq., and Tiffany Solari, Esq., of the law firm of Clark Hill, PLLC; and Defendants Brigido Bayawa, Leilani Flores, and Ma Lita Sastrillo, by and through their counsel, Phillip N. Smith, Jr., Esq., and Marissa T. Fehrman, Esq., of the law firm of Weinberg, Wheeler, Hudgins, Gunn & Dial, LLC (“Defendants”), hereby respectfully submit this Stipulation and Order for Plaintiffs to File Their Response to Nurse Defendants Leilani Flores, Ma Lita Sastrillo, And Brigido Bayawa's Motion In Limine To Preclude Opinions And Testimony Of Stan Smith, Ph.D. (“Motion”) [DKT 96] filed April 7, 2023. The parties are respectfully requesting that the Court extend the deadline for Plaintiffs to respond to the Motion for an additional fourteen (14) days, up to and including May 5, 2023.
Although Plaintiffs' counsel has begun working on responding to the Motion, counsel requires an extension to complete the Response. This request for extension is made in good faith and not for the purposes of delay.
WHEREFORE, the parties stipulate that the time for Plaintiffs to file their response to said Motion be extended an additional fourteen (14) days up to and including May 5, 2023 APROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT on the 17th day of April 2023:
IT IS SO ORDERED.