From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lopez v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Mar 21, 2012
No. 4D10-5110 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Mar. 21, 2012)

Opinion

No. 4D10-5110

03-21-2012

ROGER LOPEZ, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Antonio Bugge, Miami, for appellant. No appearance required for appellee.


.

We affirm the summary denial of appellant's motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Flores v. State, 57 So. 3d 218 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). However, we note that this decision expressly and directly conflicts with Hernandez v. State, 61 So. 3d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011). See Fla. R. App. P. 9.030(a)(2)(A)(iv). We certify conflict and certify a question of great public importance:

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.172(C)(8) BAR IMMIGRATION-BASED INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL CLAIMS BASED ON THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT'S DECISION IN PADILLA V. KENTUCKY, 130 S.CT. 1473 (2010)?
See Fla. R. App. P. 9.030(a)(2)(A)(v).

Affirmed; Conflict and Question Certified.

TAYLOR, GERBER and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Kenneth L. Gillespie, Judge; L.T. Case No. 09-2991 CF10A.

Antonio Bugge, Miami, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.


Summaries of

Lopez v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Mar 21, 2012
No. 4D10-5110 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Mar. 21, 2012)
Case details for

Lopez v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROGER LOPEZ, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Date published: Mar 21, 2012

Citations

No. 4D10-5110 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Mar. 21, 2012)