Opinion
No. 14-06-00392-CR.
February 1, 2007. DO NOT PUBLISH. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
On Appeal from the 337th District Court Harris County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 1036527.
Panel consists of Justices YATES, ANDERSON, and HUDSON.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
After a jury trial, appellant was found guilty of the offense of aggravated robbery, and on April 26, 2006, was sentenced to confinement for fifteen years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a notice of appeal. Appellant's appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978). A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991). The court was advised that appellant received a copy of the record on September 11, 2006. Appellant was granted two extensions of time until November 10, 2006, to file the pro se response. As of this date, more than sixty days has elapsed and no pro se response or further motion for extension has been filed. We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the record. A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.