Opinion
04-06-00742-CR
Delivered and Filed: July 18, 2007. DO NOT PUBLISH.
Appeal from the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, Trial Court No. 2005-CR-9022W, Honorable Mark R. Luitjen, Judge Presiding.
Sitting: CATHERINE STONE, Justice, PHYLIS J. SPEEDLIN, Justice, REBECCA SIMMONS, Justice.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Ronnie López pleaded nolo contendere to a charge of unauthorized use of a vehicle. López was placed on community supervision for a term of four years for the offense. The State subsequently filed a motion to revoke López's community supervision, alleging López had violated the terms of his community supervision by committing the offense of possession of marijuana and failing to report to his supervision officer. After a hearing on the State's motion, the trial court revoked López's community supervision and sentenced López to two years confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice and fined him $1,200. We affirm. López's court-appointed appellate attorney filed a brief containing a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating that there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. Counsel concludes that the appeal is without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to López, who was advised of his right to examine the record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed. After reviewing the record, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed. Furthermore, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw. Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 86 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n. 1 (Tex.App. — San Antonio 1996, no pet.). Catherine Stone, Justice