From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lopez v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Mar 27, 2024
No. 03-23-00380-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 27, 2024)

Opinion

03-23-00380-CR 03-23-00381-CR

03-27-2024

Christopher West Lopez, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee Christopher Lopez, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee


Do Not Publish

FROM THE 427TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NOS. D-1-DC-15-205012, D-1-DC-15-100158, THE HONORABLE TAMARA NEEDLES, JUDGE PRESIDING

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Kelly

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant's brief in each of the above appeals was originally due November 2, 2023. After this Court granted counsel three motions requesting an extension of time to file appellant's brief, the brief was due March 1, 2024. In granting the most recent extension, this Court advised counsel that no further extensions would be granted and that failure to file the brief by the deadline would result in the referral of these cases to the trial court for a hearing under Rule 38.8(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

On February 28, 2024, counsel filed her fourth motion for extension of time to file appellant's brief, in which she represented that while drafting appellant's brief "[that] week," she "realized that critical transcripts and exhibits were not included in the reporter's record that was submitted to" this Court, including a record of appellant's sentencing hearing, "any exhibits that may have been introduced as part of that sentencing hearing," and an expert report that was admitted as a defense exhibit. That same date, counsel filed with the district court a motion to supplement the record. Counsel requests that we grant her an additional thirty days, after the date the supplemental record is filed, to file appellant's brief.

Although counsel did not specify in her motion when that date would be, the supplemental record was filed in this Court on March 18, 2024.

The reporter's record and exhibits were filed in this Court on September 21, 2023. The missing portions from that record should have been discovered by counsel before now. We deny counsel's motion for an additional extension.

The appeal is abated and remanded to the trial court. The trial court shall conduct a hearing on counsel's failure to timely file appellant's brief and shall make appropriate written findings and recommendations. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). If necessary, the court shall appoint substitute counsel who will effectively represent appellant in this appeal. Following the hearing, which shall be transcribed, the trial court shall order the appropriate supplemental clerk's and reporter's records-including all findings and orders-to be prepared and forwarded to this Court no later than April 26, 2024. See id. R. 38.8(b)(3). It is so ordered March 27, 2024.


Summaries of

Lopez v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Mar 27, 2024
No. 03-23-00380-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 27, 2024)
Case details for

Lopez v. State

Case Details

Full title:Christopher West Lopez, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin

Date published: Mar 27, 2024

Citations

No. 03-23-00380-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 27, 2024)