From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lopez v. Schwarzenegger

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 4, 2011
No. CIV S-09-1760 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. May. 4, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-1760 MCE GGH P.

May 4, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff is a prison inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action. On March 21, 2011, plaintiff filed his fourth request for the appointment of counsel. Plaintiff's previous requests were filed on June 7, 2010, July 29, 2010, and November 15, 2010. All requests were denied and in light of those orders, this request will also be denied. Plaintiff additionally asks for sanctions to be imposed on defendants' counsel with regard to alleged misstatements and for filing frivolous motions, by which he apparently means, the pending motions to dismiss, which request will also be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's March 21, 2011, request for appointment of counsel and for sanctions (Docket No. 52) is denied.


Summaries of

Lopez v. Schwarzenegger

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 4, 2011
No. CIV S-09-1760 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. May. 4, 2011)
Case details for

Lopez v. Schwarzenegger

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW RICK LOPEZ, Plaintiff, v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 4, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-09-1760 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. May. 4, 2011)