From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lopez v. N.Y.C. Health and Hospitals Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 30, 2000
270 A.D.2d 466 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued February 17, 2000.

March 30, 2000.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for employment discrimination, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barron, J.), dated May 6, 1999, which, inter alia, granted those branches of the defendants' motion which were for leave to move for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3212(a), to dismiss so much of the complaint as asserted a cause of action to recover damages pursuant to the New York City Human Rights Law, and to strike his demand for a jury trial.

Scott Scott, LLP, Melville, N.Y. (Jonathan C. Scott and Robert Scott of counsel), for appellant.

Michael D. Hess, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Francis F. Caputo and Paul L. Herzfeld of counsel), for respondents.

FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., DANIEL W. JOY, WILLIAM C. THOMPSON, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

All of the plaintiff's present contentions are raised for the first time on appeal, and therefore are not properly before this court (see, Fleet Bank v. Powerhouse Trading Corp., 267 A.D.2d 276 [2d Dept., Dec. 13, 1999]; Dufficy v. Wharf Bar Grill, 217 A.D.2d 646 ). In any event, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the defendants' motion for leave to move for summary judgment (see, 3212[a]; Olzaski v. Locust Val. Cent. School Dist., 256 A.D.2d 320 ; Rossi v. Arnot Ogden Med. Ctr., 252 A.D.2d 778 ). Further, so much of the complaint as asserted a cause of action to recover damages pursuant to the New York City Human Rights Law (Administrative Code of City of N Y § 8-101 et seq.) was properly dismissed, since the private right of action created by Administrative Code § 8-502 applies only to causes of action arising on or after its effective date (see, Local Laws, 1991, No. 39 of City of New York § 4[6]; Batchelor v. NYNEX Telesector Resources Group., 213 A.D.2d 189, 190 ).

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit.

SANTUCCI, J.P., JOY, THOMPSON, and GOLDSTEIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lopez v. N.Y.C. Health and Hospitals Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 30, 2000
270 A.D.2d 466 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Lopez v. N.Y.C. Health and Hospitals Corp.

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD LOPEZ, appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY HEALTH AND HOSPITALS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 30, 2000

Citations

270 A.D.2d 466 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
705 N.Y.S.2d 279