From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lopez v. Homan

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 4, 2023
3:19-cv-98-RCJ-CSD (D. Nev. Apr. 4, 2023)

Opinion

3:19-cv-98-RCJ-CSD

04-04-2023

PAUL LOPEZ, Plaintiff, v. HOMAN, et al., Defendants.

Travis N. Barrick, Esq. Douglas R. Rands, Esq.


Travis N. Barrick, Esq.

Douglas R. Rands, Esq.

ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff, Paul Lopez, by and through counsel, Travis N. Barrick, Esq. of Gallian Welker & Associates, and Defendants in this case, by and through counsel, Aaron D. Ford, Attorney General of the State of Nevada, and Douglas R. Rands, Senior Deputy Attorney General of the State of Nevada, Office of the Attorney General, under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice, with each party bearing their own attorney's fees and costs.

The Parties have resolved this matter in its entirety and agree that the Court may accordingly close the case, with prejudice. Any outstanding deadlines are considered moot.

This stipulation is based upon the settlement agreement between the parties to dismiss all claims at issue in this matter.

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED THAT THIS MATTER IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.


Summaries of

Lopez v. Homan

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 4, 2023
3:19-cv-98-RCJ-CSD (D. Nev. Apr. 4, 2023)
Case details for

Lopez v. Homan

Case Details

Full title:PAUL LOPEZ, Plaintiff, v. HOMAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Apr 4, 2023

Citations

3:19-cv-98-RCJ-CSD (D. Nev. Apr. 4, 2023)