From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lopez v. Homan

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 16, 2022
3:19-cv-00098-RCJ-CSD (D. Nev. Nov. 16, 2022)

Opinion

3:19-cv-00098-RCJ-CSD

11-16-2022

PAUL LOPEZ, Plaintiff, v. HOMAN, et al., Defendants.

GALLIAN WELKER & ASSOCIATES, L.C. TRAVIS N. BARRICK, Bar No. 9257 Attorneys for Plaintiff AARON D. FORD Attorney General DOUGLAS R. RANDS, Bar No. 3572 Senior Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants Ronald Bryant, James Dzurenda, Timothy Filson, William Gittere, Dennis Homan, Robert Huston, Scott Manning, William Reubart and David Tristan


GALLIAN WELKER & ASSOCIATES, L.C.

TRAVIS N. BARRICK, Bar No. 9257

Attorneys for Plaintiff

AARON D. FORD

Attorney General

DOUGLAS R. RANDS, Bar No. 3572

Senior Deputy Attorney General

Attorneys for Defendants Ronald Bryant, James Dzurenda, Timothy Filson, William Gittere, Dennis Homan, Robert Huston, Scott Manning, William Reubart and David Tristan

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

All Parties, Plaintiff Paul Lopez, and Defendants, Ronald Bryant, James Dzurenda, Timothy Filson, William Gittere, Dennis Homan, Robert Huston, Scott Manning, William Reubart, and David Tristan hereby stipulate to the following terms regarding the confidentiality of documents and tangible materials relevant to this case, and request that the Court enter a corresponding order:

1. “Confidential Material.” As used in this Protective Order, confidential material shall refer to records and/or things any party designates as confidential information, including material that would reasonably threaten the safety and security of the institution or the health and safety of a prisoner or staff in the institution if disclosed to a prisoner. All confidential material is the exclusive, inalienable property of the party producing the materials or acquiring the same from a non-party.

2. “Records.” As used in this Protective Order, records shall mean information that is in document form, inscribed or otherwise recorded on a tangible medium, or that is stored in an electronic or other medium and is retrievable in perceivable form. Records include both electronic records and printed, typewritten, and other tangible records.

3. Scope. This Protective Order shall govern confidential material produced or disclosed by any party in response to formal or informal discovery conducted in this matter. Nothing in this Protective Order shall be deemed to preclude a party's right to: (a) oppose discovery on grounds not addressed under the terms of this Protective Order, or (b) object on any ground to the admission of any confidential material into evidence. Further, nothing contained in this Protective Order shall prejudice the right of any party to contest the alleged relevancy, admissibility, or discoverability of the confidential material sought.

4. Designation of Confidential Material. Any party may designate all or any portion of records and/or things it produces formally or informally to other parties to this litigation or obtains through subpoena as confidential material. The designation of confidential material shall be made by any practicable means, including placing on the thing so designated, such that it will not interfere with its legibility, an appropriate notice such as the following: “confidential” or “confidential material.” Confidential material will be Bates stamped, if appropriate. All records and things designated as confidential material shall be treated as such pursuant to the terms of this Protective Order until further ordered by the Court.

5. Unintentional Disclosure. Inadvertent production of any materials without a confidential designation will not waive a party's claim that the information is confidential or estop a party from designating the information as confidential at a later date. If materials have not yet been designated as confidential, disclosure of them by the other party does not violate this Order.

6. Objection to Designation. If any party objects to the designation of any record or thing as confidential material, that party shall promptly notify all other parties in writing within thirty (30) days of receipt of the confidential material. The parties shall have a period of no longer than twenty (20) days to resolve the dispute by agreement. If the dispute is not resolved by agreement, the designating party shall move to enforce the confidential designation ten (10) days thereafter. The designating party shall bear the burden of establishing that the materials are properly designated as confidential. Pending such determination by the Court (or the expiration of the period in which any party may make a challenge to an adverse ruling, if later), the records and/or things shall be maintained as confidential material.

7. Access to Confidential Material. Access to confidential material shall be limited to the parties, the attorneys of the parties in this action, the attorneys' clerical, secretarial, and support staff, witnesses and potential witnesses, and outside experts or other consultants retained to assist in the prosecution or defense of this action. Under no circumstances shall any confidential material be disclosed to an offender housed within any institution or facility of the Nevada Department of Corrections. Confidential material may also be disclosed to the persons that authored or created the same. Confidential material, to the extent they discuss a particular person, may be disclosed to the person so discussed. Such access shall only be for the purposes of this litigation and not for any other purpose. Parties, witnesses, and potential witnesses may only view confidential materials in the presence of a party's counsel; they may not be given copies of any confidential materials.

8. Disclosure. Confidential materials shall not be disclosed or communicated to any person except attorneys for the parties and their employees unless and until that person has been given a copy of this Order.

Other than as provided, confidential material may not be disclosed except pursuant to an Order of the Court, or pursuant to a modification of this Order by a writing signed by counsel for all parties.

9. Storage of Confidential Material. Persons receiving confidential information shall maintain all confidential material in a secure location.

10. Use of Confidential Material. Persons receiving confidential information shall use the confidential material for the purpose of this lawsuit only.

(a) No confidential material will be produced, disclosed, or otherwise utilized in any other litigation, whether or not that litigation involves parties to this case. Further, no confidential material shall be disseminated to or shared with any organization or entity, or any representative thereof, that regularly disseminates documents or information regarding documents, including abstracts or summaries, or any other records as a service to its members, subscribers, or others, or the representative of such an organization or entity.

(b) If any subpoenas, requests for production, or other forms of discovery in connection with other litigation are served on any authorized person, that authorized person will immediately notify counsel of record for the party designating the materials as confidential, provide such counsel with a copy of the subpoena or other discovery request, will consent to and assist in obtaining an order from the appropriate court protecting the confidential material from being disseminated outside the scope of this Protective Order of confidentiality.

11. Confidential Material Submitted to the Court. If there exists any confidential material to be filed with the Court, including but not limited to any pleading, motion, transcript, videotape, exhibit, photograph, or other material filed with any court that incorporates or includes confidential material, an attempt shall be made to file same under seal.

(a) Confidential material in the form of attachments to summary judgment or dispositive motions, or documents that are identified in the joint pretrial order may be filed under seal only after the Court orders that such documents may be sealed because “compelling reasons” exist to seal them. See Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006). The confidential material will not be filed until after the Court has ruled on the party's Motion to File Documents Under Seal.

(b) Confidential material that is not being submitted to the Court as part of a summary judgment or other dispositive motion, or as part of a joint pretrial order, may be filed under seal without first seeking a further order to seal from the Court. Such documents may be filed under seal pursuant to this Protective Order.

(c) Confidential material that is submitted to the Court for in camera review shall be submitted in accordance with LR 10-5, i.e., material will be submitted in an envelope that bears a captioned cover sheet marked “for in camera review only.” When the Court has completed its review of such materials, the materials will be returned to the party that submitted them.

12. Depositions. Discovery material furnished by a party in the form of testimony shall be designated as confidential either at the time the testimony is taken, or in writing within twenty (20) days after the transcript of the testimony has been received by the designating party. The court reporter for any such testimony shall be informed of this Order by the party making the confidential designation. The court reporter shall comply with and be bound by this Order. In the event the party furnishing deposition testimony designates portions or all of that testimony as confidential, the court reporter shall separately transcribe and submit under seal, to counsel for the parties, transcriptions of the testimony designated as confidential. Confidential transcripts of deposition testimony shall be treated the same and afforded the same protections as other material designated as confidential under this Order.

Nothing in this Order shall be construed to preclude counsel from showing confidential material to any witnesses during depositions in this action, hearings conducted in this action, or at trial of this action. Any counsel showing confidential material shall have a good faith basis for making the disclosure and shall act in good faith. In the event any confidential material is shown to a witness, it shall not lose its confidential status. Counsel for each party shall show confidential information to a witness in a manner that will protect the confidential material from further disclosure. Any witness shown confidential material shall state under oath on the record that the witness agrees to be bound by this Protective Order.

13. Evidence at Trial. Any party objecting to the introduction at trial of any confidential materials or that seeks to maintain the confidentiality of such materials at trial shall make a motion to the court. Such moving party will have the burden of establishing good cause to bar the introduction of such materials or maintain their confidential status at trial. Such motion shall be made within ten (10) days of the submission of the parties' final pre-trial order which will in turn designate all materials, except those used for purposes of impeachment, that a party seeks to introduce at trial. The designation of confidential materials in the final pre-trial order shall be by opaque descriptions such as Bates number that does not disclose any confidential information.

14. Improper Disclosure. Should any confidential material be disclosed to any unauthorized person, the unauthorized person (a) shall be informed properly of the provisions of this Protective Order of confidentiality by the party who first learns of the disclosure, and upon such notice shall be subject to the terms of this Protective Order of confidentiality; (b) shall be identified immediately to counsel of record for the party designating the materials as confidential; and (c) shall be directed, if within control of a party or his/her/its counsel, or otherwise asked, to sign a Promise of Confidentiality. At the sole discretion of the party designating the materials as confidential, such unauthorized person may be required to surrender to the party designating the materials as confidential all copies of confidential material in such unauthorized person's possession. The person or entity who caused the unauthorized disclosure shall be responsible for securing the unauthorized person's assent to the Promise of Confidentiality and for all reasonable attorneys' fees, costs, and expenses associated with enforcement of this Protective Order of Confidentiality.

15. Return of Confidential Material. The provisions of this Order shall survive the termination of this action. Within thirty (30) days of the termination of this action (including appeals), the parties shall return all confidential materials to counsel for the disclosing party, without keeping any copies (paper, electronic, or otherwise). Any party seeking the return of materials shall assume the costs of having the same returned.

In lieu of returning confidential materials, the party in possession of such information may destroy such materials. The party in possession of confidential information must notify counsel for the disclosing party in writing of the destruction of the information within sixty (60) days of the conclusion of litigation between the parties.

Counsel for the parties are responsible for retrieving from their retained experts and consultants all confidential materials and returning or destroying them, and for assuring that their retained experts and consultants do not keep any copies. In lieu of having such materials returned, such counsel shall secure a written confirmation from their retained expert and consultants that such materials have been destroyed.

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

ORDER

Paragraph 11(a) is also governed by Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1097 (9th Cir. 2016).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lopez v. Homan

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 16, 2022
3:19-cv-00098-RCJ-CSD (D. Nev. Nov. 16, 2022)
Case details for

Lopez v. Homan

Case Details

Full title:PAUL LOPEZ, Plaintiff, v. HOMAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Nov 16, 2022

Citations

3:19-cv-00098-RCJ-CSD (D. Nev. Nov. 16, 2022)