From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lopez v. Haskell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 4, 2018
Case No. 5:18-cv-01196-CJC-KES (C.D. Cal. Sep. 4, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 5:18-cv-01196-CJC-KES

09-04-2018

MICHAEL ZAMORA LOPEZ, Plaintiff, v. TIMOTHY A. HASKELL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings and all the records and files herein, along with the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. 2) is DENIED and that Judgment be entered: (a) dismissing the claims against Timothy Haskell, Michael Ramos, John Tomberlin, and James Terrell with prejudice, (b) dismissing the remaining claims without prejudice, and (c) dismissing the complaint (Dkt. 1) without leave to amend. DATED: September 4, 2018

/s/_________

CORMAC J. CARNEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Lopez v. Haskell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 4, 2018
Case No. 5:18-cv-01196-CJC-KES (C.D. Cal. Sep. 4, 2018)
Case details for

Lopez v. Haskell

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL ZAMORA LOPEZ, Plaintiff, v. TIMOTHY A. HASKELL, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 4, 2018

Citations

Case No. 5:18-cv-01196-CJC-KES (C.D. Cal. Sep. 4, 2018)