From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lopez v. Grainey

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 3, 2009
2:08-cv-1342 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 3, 2009)

Opinion

2:08-cv-1342.

March 3, 2009


ORDER OF COURT


AND NOW, this 3rd day of March, 2009, the Court hereby VACATES the Order of Court dated March 2, 2009 (Document No. 28) because same was improvidently granted as the Court had not previously reviewed the Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Document No. 23.)

Upon consideration of Plaintiff's OBJECTION TO THE REPORT AND OPINION OF MAGISTRATE LISA PUPO LENIHAN, DATED DEC. 17TH, 08 (Document No. 27), and it appearing that said Order of the Magistrate Judge is not clearly erroneous, contrary to law, or an abuse of discretion, as Plaintiff has failed to meet the requirements for a preliminary injunction, specifically (i) the likelihood of success on the merits and (ii) failure to show irreparable harm necessary to justify such extraordinary relief,

Now therefore, Plaintiff's Objection is DENIED and DISMISSED.

So ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lopez v. Grainey

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 3, 2009
2:08-cv-1342 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 3, 2009)
Case details for

Lopez v. Grainey

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE IVAN LOPEZ, Plaintiff, v. DAVID GRAINEY, Major, VICTOR SANTOYO…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 3, 2009

Citations

2:08-cv-1342 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 3, 2009)