From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lopez v. Garcia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 16, 2020
No. 2:20-cv-0251 TLN AC P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 16, 2020)

Opinion

No. 2:20-cv-0251 TLN AC P

04-16-2020

EUTIMIO LOPEZ, Plaintiff, v. U. GARCIA, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed February 6, 2020, plaintiff was directed to pay the filing fee to proceed with this action, or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis affidavit together with a certified copy of his prison trust account statement. ECF No. 3. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to comply within thirty days would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id. at 1. The thirty-day period has expired and plaintiff has not responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within twenty-one (21) days after the filing date of these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the district court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). DATED: April 16, 2020

/s/_________

ALLISON CLAIRE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Lopez v. Garcia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 16, 2020
No. 2:20-cv-0251 TLN AC P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 16, 2020)
Case details for

Lopez v. Garcia

Case Details

Full title:EUTIMIO LOPEZ, Plaintiff, v. U. GARCIA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 16, 2020

Citations

No. 2:20-cv-0251 TLN AC P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 16, 2020)