Opinion
Civil Action 4:22-cv-03399
11-17-2022
OSIRIS EDWARD LOPEZ, Plaintiff, v. ETA, et al, Defendants.
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
Hon. Charles Eskridge United States District Judge.
Pending is a Memorandum and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Christina A. Bryan dated October 26, 2022. Dkt 9. No party objected.
The district court reviews de novo those conclusions of a magistrate judge to which a party has specifically objected. See FRCP 72(b)(3) & 28 USC § 636(b)(1)(C); see also United States v Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir 1989, per curiam). The district court may accept any other portions to which there's no objection if satisfied that no clear error appears on the face of the record. See Guillory v PPG Industries Inc, 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir 2005), citing Douglass v United Services Automobile Association, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir 1996, en banc); see also FRCP 72(b) advisory committee note (1983).
No clear error appears upon review and consideration of the Memorandum and Recommendation, the record, and the applicable law.
The Memorandum and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the Memorandum and Order of this Court. Dkt. 9.
The emergency motion by Plaintiff Osiris Edward Lopez for initial satisfaction, protective order, and postjudgment relief is DENIED. Dkt 8.
All claims asserted by Plaintiff Osiris Edward Lopez in this case are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
A final judgment will issue by separate order.
SO ORDERED.