From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lopez v. District of Columbia

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Sep 1, 2005
388 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2005)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 03-1665 (JMF).

September 1, 2005.

Matthew B. Bogin, Futrovsky, Nitkin Scherr, Chartered, Rockville, MD, Rebekah Antoni Gleason, Florida Coastal School of Law, Jacksonville, FL, for Plaintiff.

Eden Ilene Miller, Office of the Corporation Counsel, Washington, DC, for Defendants.


ORDER


On August 9, 2005, this court ordered defendants to "pay plaintiff $9,530.00 in attorneys' fees." Defendants then moved to alter or amend that Order because, as the court had recognized, the District of Columbia Appropriations Act limits the amount of attorneys' fees that the District of Columbia can pay to prevailing parties, but it does not limit the power of federal courts to award fees under the IDEA. Defendant also requests that the date for payment of fees be extended to 30 days from the date of the amended order, in light of administrative requirements for processing District payment on such checks. Plaintiff did not respond.

Upon consideration of the motion and the entire record herein, it is, hereby, ORDERED that:

1. Defendant's Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment [#59] is GRANTED; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that
2. Plaintiff is awarded $9,350 in attorneys' fees and costs; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that
3. Defendants shall pay plaintiff that much of the attorneys' fees and costs awarded as is permissible under the statutory fee cap, within 30 days of the date of this Amended Order.
SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lopez v. District of Columbia

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Sep 1, 2005
388 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2005)
Case details for

Lopez v. District of Columbia

Case Details

Full title:ALEJANDRA LOPEZ, Parent and Friend of C.C., a Minor, Plaintiff, v…

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Sep 1, 2005

Citations

388 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2005)

Citing Cases

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bannum, Inc.

But other district courts have reached the opposite conclusion. See Parks v. Bre/Sanibel Inn Owner L.L.C.,…

Driscoll v. George Wash. Univ.

Such tasks are generally considered “normal administrative overhead” that are not compensable. SeeLopez v.…