From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lopez v. Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Nov 24, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:19cv593 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 24, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:19cv593

11-24-2020

JUAN ANTONIO LOPEZ, #2249241 v. LORIE DAVIS


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On October 7, 2020, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 12), recommending that Plaintiff's civil rights complaints be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1).

This Court reviews the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge de novo only if a party objects within fourteen days of service of the Report and Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In conducting a de novo review, the Court examines the entire record and makes an independent assessment under the law. Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), superseded on other grounds by statute, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (extending the time to file objections from ten to fourteen days). Here, Plaintiff did not file objections in the prescribed period. The Court therefore reviews the Magistrate Judge's findings for clear error or abuse of discretion and reviews her legal conclusions to determine whether they are contrary to law. See United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 918 (1989) (holding that, if no objections to a Magistrate Judge's Report are filed, the standard of review is "clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law").

Having reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the Court finds no clear error or abuse of discretion and no conclusions contrary to law. The Court therefore adopts the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 12) as the findings of this Court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report (Docket No. 12) is ADOPTED. It is further

ORDERED that Plaintiff's suit is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1).

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 24th day of November, 2020.

/s/_________

JEREMY D. KERNODLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Lopez v. Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Nov 24, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:19cv593 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 24, 2020)
Case details for

Lopez v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:JUAN ANTONIO LOPEZ, #2249241 v. LORIE DAVIS

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Date published: Nov 24, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:19cv593 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 24, 2020)

Citing Cases

Kopatz v. Doe

He states no facts to show that the Director of the State Classification Committee was aware of a specific…