From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lopez v. Cox

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jul 14, 2014
No. 65402 (Nev. Jul. 14, 2014)

Opinion

No. 65402

07-14-2014

OSWALDO LOPEZ, Appellant, v. JAMES GREG COX; FRANKLIN DICKENS; TODD DRAKE; HENRY HENSEL; SAMANTHA MAHON; COLE MARROW; OSCAR MENENDEZ; JENNIFF NASH; DWIGHT NEVEN; AND HAROLD WICKHAM, Respondents.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Appellant seeks to challenge a district court order denying a motion for appointment of counsel. As no statute or court rule authorizes an appeal from such an order, the challenged order is not substantively appealable. See NRAP 3A(b) (listing orders and judgments from which an appeal may be taken); see also Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels Corp., 100 Nev. 207, 209, 678 P.2d 1152, 1153 (1984). Thus, because we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

__________, J.

Pickering
__________, J.
Parraguirre
__________, J.
Saitta
cc: Hon. Kerry Louise Earley, District Judge

Oswaldo P. Lopez

Cole Marrow

Attorney General/Carson City

Franklin Dickens

Harold Wickham

Henry Hensel

Jenniff Nash

Oscar Menendez

Samantha Mahon

Todd Drake

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Lopez v. Cox

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jul 14, 2014
No. 65402 (Nev. Jul. 14, 2014)
Case details for

Lopez v. Cox

Case Details

Full title:OSWALDO LOPEZ, Appellant, v. JAMES GREG COX; FRANKLIN DICKENS; TODD DRAKE…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Jul 14, 2014

Citations

No. 65402 (Nev. Jul. 14, 2014)