Opinion
CASE NO.: 1:11-cv-01547-LJO-SMS
09-14-2011
MARIO LOPEZ JR., DECEASED, THROUGH HIS CO-SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST, MARIO LOPEZ III AND MICHAEL LOPEZ; ELIDA LOPEZ, Individually; MARIO LOPEZ III, Individually; and MICHAEL LOPEZ, Individually, Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF TULARE, a public entity, TULARE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, a public entity, TULARE COUNTY SHERIFF-CORONER WILLIAM WITTMAN, in his individual and official capacities, DEPUTY CHRISTOPHER LANDIN, Individually, and DOES 1 through 20, Jointly and Severally, Defendants.
DENNIS R. THELEN, SBN 83999 KEVIN E. THELEN, SBN 252665 LAW OFFICES OF LEBEAU THELEN, LLP KATHLEEN BALES-LANGE, #094765 County Counsel for the County of Tulare TERESA M. SAUCEDO, #093121 Chief Deputy County Counsel Attorneys for Defendants, COUNTY OF TULARE, TULARE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, TULARE COUNTY SHERIFF-CORONER WILLIAM WITMANN, AND DEPUTY CHRISTOPHER LANDIN
DENNIS R. THELEN, SBN 83999
KEVIN E. THELEN, SBN 252665
LAW OFFICES OF
LEBEAU • THELEN, LLP
KATHLEEN BALES-LANGE, #094765
County Counsel for the County of Tulare
TERESA M. SAUCEDO, #093121
Chief Deputy County Counsel
Attorneys for Defendants, COUNTY OF TULARE, TULARE
COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, TULARE COUNTY
SHERIFF-CORONER WILLIAM WITMANN, AND
DEPUTY CHRISTOPHER LANDIN
JOINT STIPULATION OF THE
PARTIES; ORDER
The parties to the above referenced action, subject to the Court's approval, hereby stipulate to the following:
WHEREAS the parties desire to provide counsel for defendants further time to prepare a reply to plaintiffs' Opposition to defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure;
WHEREAS counsel for plaintiffs provided a similar professional courtesy to counsel for defendants in allowing defendants further time to respond to the Plaintiffs' Complaint;
WHEREAS counsel for defendants provided a similar professional courtesy to counsel for plaintiffs in allowing plaintiffs further time to respond to the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike;
WHEREAS counsel for defendant has multiple pressing matters, including three days of out-of-town events, that will prevent counsel from preparing a full and complete reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike on the currently set briefing schedule;
The parties HEREBY AGREE, subject to the Court's approval, to modify the time frames relating to the defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike as follows:
1. Defendants' Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike was previously scheduled to be filed on or before Wednesday, December 7, 2011;
2. Defendants' Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike shall now be set to be filed on or before Tuesday, December 13, 2011;
Respectfully submitted,
LeBEAU • THELEN, LLP
By: DENNIS R. THELEN, ESQ.
Attorneys for Defendants
COUNTY OF TULARE
KATHLEEN BALES-LANGE
Tulare County Counsel
By: TERESA M. SAUCEDO
Attorneys for Defendants
COUNTY OF TULARE, TULARE COUNTY
SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, TULARE
COUNTY SHERIFF-CORONER WILLIAM
WITTMAN, AND DEPUTY CHRISTOPHER
LANDIN
HADDAD & SHERWIN
By: MICHAEL HADDAD, ESQ.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs MARIO LOPEZ JR.,
DECEASED, THROUGH HIS CO
SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST, MARIO LOPEZ
III AND MICHAEL LOPEZ; ELIDA LOPEZ,
Individually; MARIO LOPEZ III, Individually;
and MICHAEL LOPEZ, Individually,
ORDER
This Court APPROVES the proposed revised deadline to file reply papers and LIMITS reply points and authorities to no more than 10 pages.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Lawrence J. O'Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE