From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lopez v. City of Corpus Christi

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
Jan 28, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18-CV-430 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 28, 2019)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18-CV-430

01-28-2019

DANIEL LOPEZ, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, et al, Defendants.


ORDER

Before the Court are Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (D.E. 7, 8). With leave of Court, Plaintiff timely filed an amended complaint (D.E. 14), which does not reference the earlier complaint (D.E. 1). "An amended complaint supersedes the original complaint and renders it of no legal effect unless the amended complaint specifically refers to and adopts or incorporates by reference the earlier pleading." King v. Dogan, 31 F.3d 344, 346 (5th Cir. 1994) (citing Boelens v. Redman Homes, Inc., 759 F.2d 504, 508 (5th Cir.1985)). A Rule 12(b)(6) motion addressed to a superseded complaint is moot. See Maxim Integrated Prod., Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., No. SA-14-CV-1030-XR, 2015 WL 10990119, at *1 (W.D. Tex. Feb. 12, 2015) (citing Merritt v. Fogel, 349 F. App'x 742, 745 (3d Cir. 2009)). Consequently, the Court TERMINATES AS MOOT Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (D.E. 7, 8).

ORDERED this 28th day of January, 2019.

/s/_________

NELVA GONZALES RAMOS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Lopez v. City of Corpus Christi

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
Jan 28, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18-CV-430 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 28, 2019)
Case details for

Lopez v. City of Corpus Christi

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL LOPEZ, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, et al, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

Date published: Jan 28, 2019

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18-CV-430 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 28, 2019)