From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lopez v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 2, 2012
CASE NO. 1:10-cv-01773-AWI-SKO PC (E.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:10-cv-01773-AWI-SKO PC

07-02-2012

ANDREW R. LOPEZ, Plaintiff, v. MATHEW CATE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER STRIKING MOTION


(Doc. 28)

Plaintiff Andrew R. Lopez, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on September 10, 2010. On June 15, 2012, following the denial of Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration relating to the appointment of counsel, Plaintiff filed a motion seeking to "preserve" his right to appeal and complaining about various proceedings. (Doc. 28.)

Plaintiff's motion does not seek a recognized form of relief. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED STRICKEN from the record.

Plaintiff is not precluded from filing a notice of appeal if he wishes to do so. If the appeal is premature or otherwise deficient, it will be dismissed by the appellate court, but Plaintiff is not precluded from filing the notice of appeal. However, Plaintiff may not "reserve" the right to appeal nor may he complain about proceedings in the absence of a request for a legitimate form of relief.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Lopez v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 2, 2012
CASE NO. 1:10-cv-01773-AWI-SKO PC (E.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2012)
Case details for

Lopez v. Cate

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW R. LOPEZ, Plaintiff, v. MATHEW CATE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 2, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 1:10-cv-01773-AWI-SKO PC (E.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2012)