From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lopez v. Schwarzenegger

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 19, 2010
No. CIV S-09-1760 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-1760 MCE GGH P.

July 19, 2010


ORDER


By order filed on July 2, 2010, plaintiff was granted an extension of time of twenty-eight days to file an amended complaint. On July 9, 2010, in a note directed to the court clerk, plaintiff enclosed the form the clerk's office had apparently sent to him, returning his amended complaint because plaintiff had failed to provide a case number. In the note, plaintiff indicates that, on July 1, 2010, he separately returned the amended complaint to the court, after he had applied the case number to it. However, although plaintiff's apparently subsequently mailed note with the clerk's notice has been filed, there is no indication in the docket of the return of the amended complaint. Plaintiff is cautioned that he has only until July 30, 2010, to file an amended complaint. As plaintiff was previously informed, there will be no further extension of time.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lopez v. Schwarzenegger

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 19, 2010
No. CIV S-09-1760 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2010)
Case details for

Lopez v. Schwarzenegger

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW RICK LOPEZ, Plaintiff, v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 19, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-09-1760 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2010)