From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Loperena v. Buona

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 14, 2003
309 A.D.2d 592 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

1838, 1839

October 14, 2003.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan Saks, J.), entered May 28, 2002, which, in an action for personal injuries sustained in a hit-and-run accident involving a taxicab owned and operated by defendants, granted plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment as to liability, and order, same court and Justice, entered January 14, 2003, which, insofar as appealable, denied defendants' motion to renew, unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs.

Susan R. Nudelman, for plaintiff-respondent.

Kristofer A. Larson, for defendants-appellants.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Marlow, Gonzalez, JJ.


Plaintiff made a prima facie showing of entitlement to partial summary judgment as to liability by way of his pleadings and affidavit describing the time, place and hit-and-run circumstances of the accident, the police accident report showing the license plate number of the vehicle that struck him and confirming the time and place of the accident, and the record of the individual defendant's plea of guilty to the crime of leaving the scene of an accident. In opposition, defendants simply presented an affirmation from counsel that did not dispute liability. Defendants' motion to renew was properly denied since it failed to adduce a reasonable justification for this failure to adduce evidence in opposition (CPLR 2221[e][3]). In any event, defendant driver's affidavit in support of renewal that he was not driving the subject taxicab when plaintiff was struck and had no knowledge of the incident, fails to explain his plea of guilty to leaving the scene of an accident, and is otherwise insufficient to raise a bona fide issue of fact as to liability.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Loperena v. Buona

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 14, 2003
309 A.D.2d 592 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Loperena v. Buona

Case Details

Full title:PEDRO LOPERENA, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. FAUDE BUONA, ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 14, 2003

Citations

309 A.D.2d 592 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
765 N.Y.S.2d 355

Citing Cases

R D v. Scottsdale Ins. Co.

A motion to renew, is intended to draw the court's attention to new or additional facts which, although in…

POAG v. ATKINS

The First Department, whose precedent binds this court, has not arrived at the same conclusion. While…