From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lopardo v. Panzer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1930
228 App. Div. 709 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)

Opinion

January, 1930.


Order and judgment reversed upon the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event. While the trial court was warranted in setting aside the verdict of the jury because of improper remarks on the part of plaintiff's attorney, the facts in the case require a resubmission to a jury. Lazansky, P.J., Rich, Young, Hagarty and Scudder, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lopardo v. Panzer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1930
228 App. Div. 709 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)
Case details for

Lopardo v. Panzer

Case Details

Full title:ROSE LOPARDO, Appellant, v. CHARLES PANZER, Respondent, and MORRIS PANZER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1930

Citations

228 App. Div. 709 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)