From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Looper v. Worthington

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, at Knoxville
May 23, 2008
No. E2007-01686-CCA-R3-HC (Tenn. Crim. App. May. 23, 2008)

Opinion

No. E2007-01686-CCA-R3-HC.

Filed May 23, 2008.

Appeal from the Criminal Court for Morgan County; No. 9350; E. Eugene Eblen, Judge.

Judgment of the Criminal Court Affirmed Pursuant to Rule 20, Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals.

Byron Anthony Looper, Sr., appellant, pro se.

Robert E. Cooper, Attorney General Reporter; and John H. Bledsoe, Assistant Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.

James Curwood Witt, Jr., J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which Norma McGee Ogle and D. Kelly Thomas, Jr., JJ., joined.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


The petitioner, Byron Anthony Looper, appeals the Morgan County Criminal Court's dismissal of his petition for habeas corpus relief from his 2000 Cumberland County conviction of first degree murder. The State has moved to have this court summarily affirm the dismissal pursuant to Rule 20 of the rules of this court. The motion is well taken, and we affirm the order of dismissal pursuant to Rule 20.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus challenged the petitioner's indictment for the 1998 first degree premeditated murder of Senator Tommy Burks on the grounds that it did not allege certain facts to describe the homicide and that it failed to allege factual premises to support his enhanced sentence of life without the possibility of parole.

The scope of habeas corpus relief is limited. When the object of the challenge is the validity of an indictment that underlies a conviction, the issue is whether "the indictment is so defective as to deprive the court of jurisdiction." Dykes v. Compton, 978 S.W.2d 528, 529 (Tenn. 1998).

In the present case, the indictment is replete with all the necessary elements. See State v. Hill, 954 S.W.2d 725, 727 (Tenn. 1997). Also, our supreme court has held that an indictment need not express the factual premises for enhancement of the sentence. See, e.g., State v. Reid, 164 S.W.3d 286, 312 (Tenn. 2005).

Accordingly, the order of dismissal is summarily affirmed.


Summaries of

Looper v. Worthington

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, at Knoxville
May 23, 2008
No. E2007-01686-CCA-R3-HC (Tenn. Crim. App. May. 23, 2008)
Case details for

Looper v. Worthington

Case Details

Full title:BYRON ANTHONY LOOPER v. JIM WORTHINGTON, WARDEN

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, at Knoxville

Date published: May 23, 2008

Citations

No. E2007-01686-CCA-R3-HC (Tenn. Crim. App. May. 23, 2008)