From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Looney v. Billiter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION
May 16, 2016
Civil Action No. 7:16cv00194 (W.D. Va. May. 16, 2016)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 7:16cv00194

05-16-2016

JUSTIN CODY LOONEY, Plaintiff, v. JOHNNY BILLITER, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Justin Cody Looney, a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action claiming that the defendants denied him access to the grievance process. To state a cause of action under 28 U.S.C. § 1983, a plaintiff must allege facts indicating that he has been deprived of rights guaranteed by the Constitution or laws of the United States and that this deprivation resulted from conduct committed by a person acting under color of state law. West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42 (1988). However, an inmate has no constitutional or other federal legal right to participate in grievance proceedings. Adams v. Rice, 40 F.3d 72, 75 (4th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, Looney's allegations fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and, therefore, I will dismiss this action without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1).

ENTER: This 16th day of May, 2016.

/s/_________

NORMAN K. MOON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Looney v. Billiter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION
May 16, 2016
Civil Action No. 7:16cv00194 (W.D. Va. May. 16, 2016)
Case details for

Looney v. Billiter

Case Details

Full title:JUSTIN CODY LOONEY, Plaintiff, v. JOHNNY BILLITER, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION

Date published: May 16, 2016

Citations

Civil Action No. 7:16cv00194 (W.D. Va. May. 16, 2016)