Opinion
CA 05-02178.
April 28, 2006.
Appeals from an order of the Court of Claims (Richard E. Sise, J.), entered December 2, 2004 in three personal injury actions. The order, among other things, granted the motions of claimants for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability pursuant to Labor Law § 240 (1) and denied defendant's cross motions for summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 240 (1) and § 241 (6) claims.
BURKE, SCOLAMIERO, MORTATI HURD, LLP, ALBANY (TERESE BURKE WOLFF OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
LEVENE GOULDIN THOMPSON, LLP, BINGHAMTON (PHILIP C. JOHNSON OF COUNSEL), FOR CLAIMANTS-RESPONDENTS MICHAEL D. LOOMIS AND CHERYL L. LOOMIS.
FLINK, SMITH ASSOCIATES, LLC, LATHAM (JENNIFER DOMINELLI LECAKES OF COUNSEL), FOR CLAIMANTS-RESPONDENTS STEVEN M. GATES AND JENNIFER L. GATES.
JAMES C. HAYES, III, AMSTERDAM, FOR CLAIMANTS-RESPONDENTS WRAE ANN BAKER AND ROBERT J. BAKER.
Before: Pigott, Jr., P.J., Kehoe, Martoche, Smith and Pine, JJ.
Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation withdrawing appeal signed by the attorneys for the parties on February 8, 2006,
It is hereby ordered that said appeal with respect to claimants Michael D. Loomis and Cheryl L. Loomis be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed upon stipulation and said appeals with respect to claimants Steven M. Gates, Jennifer L. Gates, Wrae Ann Baker and Robert J. Baker are dismissed without costs ( see Hughes v. Nussbaumer, Clarke Velzy, 140 AD2d 988; Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. Roberts Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).