From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lonsdale v. Clougherty

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Jun 2, 2015
3:15-cv-00382-WHA (N.D. Cal. Jun. 2, 2015)

Opinion

          Orin Snyder (admitted pro hac vice), Laura O'Boyle (pro hac vice pending), Sarah Vacchiano (admitted pro hac vice), GIBSON, DUNN AND CRUTCHER LLP, New York, New York.,

          Emily C. Aldridge Joseph Tartakovsky, GIBSON, DUNN AND CRUTCHER LLP, San Francisco, California.,

          Joseph R. Farris, GOODWIN PROCTER LLP, San Francisco, California.,

          Brenda Sharton (pro hac vice pending), GOODWIN PROCTER LLP, Boston, MA.,

          Kristen Dumont, LAW OFFICES OF KRISTEN DUMONT, Burlingame, CA., Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant Joseph Lonsdale

          John C. Clune, (admitted pro hac vice), HUTCHINSON BLACK AND COOK, LLC, Boulder, CO.,

          L. Lin Wood, (admitted pro hac vice), Jonathan D. Grunberg, (admitted pro hac vice), David Ehrlich, (admitted pro hac vice), L. LIN WOOD, P.C., Atlanta, GA.,

          Jennifer L. Liu, THE LIU LAW FIRM, P.C., San Francisco, CA., Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Elise Clougherty.


          JOINT STIPULATION SELECTING MEDIATOR AND MODIFYING CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE TO EXTEND MEDIATION DEADLINE

          WILLIAM H. ALSUP, District Judge.

         Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Elise Clougherty ("Ms. Clougherty") and Defendant and Counterclaimant Joseph Lonsdale ("Mr. Lonsdale") stipulate and agree as follows:

         1. The Case Management Order entered on May 1, 2015 provides that a mediator be selected and on calendar by today, May 29, 2015, and that mediation be completed by September 30, 2015;

         2. The parties have conferred in good faith and selected Mark Rudy as a mediator in this case;

         3. Mr. Rudy does not presently have any availability prior to the Court's September 30, 2015 deadline, but the parties are on Mr. Rudy's calendar for October 7, 2015 and have been placed on a waitlist in the event a date in September becomes available;

         4. The parties will work diligently with the mediator in an effort to secure an earlier date and will advise the Court promptly if they are able to do so;

         5. The parties both believe that Mr. Rudy is the best choice to mediate this action given his background, experience and expertise, and respectfully request the Court's approval of a short extension of the mediation deadline to October 10, 2015;

         6. The parties believe this will not cause prejudice to either party or the Court, as an October 10, 2015 deadline remains well ahead of the discovery cut-off, currently set for December 28, 2015, and the dispositive motion deadline, currently set for March 3, 2016.

         NOW THEREFORE, the parties stipulate and agree, subject to the Court's approval, that:

(i) Mark Rudy will mediate the party's dispute;

(ii) The Court finds good cause to extend the mediation deadline to October 10, 2015;

(iii) The mediation will take place on October 7, 2015;

(iv) If Mr. Rudy comes to have earlier availability, the parties will complete the mediation by the Court's original deadline of September 30, 2015.

         [PROPOSED] ORDER

         Pursuant to the stipulated request, IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lonsdale v. Clougherty

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Jun 2, 2015
3:15-cv-00382-WHA (N.D. Cal. Jun. 2, 2015)
Case details for

Lonsdale v. Clougherty

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH LONSDALE, Counterclaimant and Defendant, v. ELISE CLOUGHERTY…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division

Date published: Jun 2, 2015

Citations

3:15-cv-00382-WHA (N.D. Cal. Jun. 2, 2015)