From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lonninge v. Berzak

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 22, 1999
262 A.D.2d 212 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

June 22, 1999.

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.).


Plaintiff makes a strong showing that his relationship with defendants with respect to the original lease was not that of subtenant but rather member in a partnership formed to hold and manage the leasehold, and that prior to the lease's expiration and contrary to the parties' express understanding that defendants were to negotiate a renewal lease with the landlord on the partnership's behalf and in the parties' joint names defendants entered into a renewal lease that named only the individual defendant's corporation as the new tenant. Such showing makes imposition of a constructive trust and an accounting appropriate remedies should plaintiff ultimately establish his interest in a partnership opportunity in the renewal lease ( see, Schneidman v. Tollman, 190 A.D.2d 524; Palazzo v. Palazzo, 121 A.D.2d 261, 265). Injunctive relief against a threatened eviction that would tend to render the constructive trust ineffectual was properly granted upon appropriate conditions.

Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Tom, Wallach and Andrias, JJ.


Summaries of

Lonninge v. Berzak

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 22, 1999
262 A.D.2d 212 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Lonninge v. Berzak

Case Details

Full title:LARS LONNINGE, Respondent, v. MICHAEL BERZAK et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 22, 1999

Citations

262 A.D.2d 212 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
692 N.Y.S.2d 330