From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lonix v. Wellpath

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Nov 22, 2024
2:24-cv-00142-BSM (E.D. Ark. Nov. 22, 2024)

Opinion

2:24-cv-00142-BSM

11-22-2024

SHANE A. LONIX ADC #145216 PLAINTIFF v. WELLPATH, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

After de novo review of the record, including Shane A. Lonix's objections, United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney's recommended disposition [Doc. No. 9] is adopted. Wellpath Incorporation Regional Office and Ms. Bennet, in her official capacity, are terminated as parties because they were not named in the amended complaint. Claims against Gary Kerstein and Captain Lane are dismissed without prejudice because Lonix has failed to state a claim against them for which relief may be granted. Jurisdiction is declined over the remaining state law claims. All pending motions are denied as moot and it is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lonix v. Wellpath

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Nov 22, 2024
2:24-cv-00142-BSM (E.D. Ark. Nov. 22, 2024)
Case details for

Lonix v. Wellpath

Case Details

Full title:SHANE A. LONIX ADC #145216 PLAINTIFF v. WELLPATH, et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Nov 22, 2024

Citations

2:24-cv-00142-BSM (E.D. Ark. Nov. 22, 2024)